<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nearly Home Time &#187; Search Engines and SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nearlyhometime.com/category/work/search-engines-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com</link>
	<description>Nice watches and where to find them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PageRank and NoFollow, follow up</title>
		<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/pagerank-and-nofollow-follow-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/pagerank-and-nofollow-follow-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines and SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NoFollow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PageRank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearlyhometime.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The head of the Google Anti Spam team, Matt Cutts has clarified Google position on this &#8216;NoFollow&#8217; and &#8216;PageRank&#8217; debate thats been raging for the last week or so, and that I posted about last week: &#8220;The PageRank and NoFollow bombshell&#8220;. I made the following comment on the blog post: This still encourages larger, more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/pagerank-and-nofollow-follow-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The PageRank and NoFollow &#8220;bombshell&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/the-pagerank-and-nofollow-bombshell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/the-pagerank-and-nofollow-bombshell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines and SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NoFollow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PageRank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearlyhometime.com/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone with an interest in SEO and especially how adding 'NoFollow' to hyperlinks interacts with PageRank will probably already be aware of the change that Google has 'sort of' announced. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/the-pagerank-and-nofollow-bombshell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google give us a splurge of new stuff to think about</title>
		<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/google-give-us-a-splurge-of-new-stuff-to-think-about/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/google-give-us-a-splurge-of-new-stuff-to-think-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines and SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearlyhometime.com/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when I was thinking that SEO had settled for a short while, along comes a whole load of new stuff to think about! The last organic search &#8216;feature&#8217; I needed to think about was the new Canonical tag which allows website owners to specify which page they wish Google to use as the primary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/google-give-us-a-splurge-of-new-stuff-to-think-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is using asp.net bad for SEO?</title>
		<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/is-using-aspnet-bad-for-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/is-using-aspnet-bad-for-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines and SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asp.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearlyhometime.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a common feeling amongst SEO experts that asp.net is bad for your website. But is that true? Not necessarily as we will find out. This article is not aimed at any specific version of .net. Whether you use version 1.1. 2 or 3.5, we are all subject to the same potential &#8220;downsides&#8221; of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/is-using-aspnet-bad-for-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First PageRank update of 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/first-pagerank-update-of-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/first-pagerank-update-of-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines and SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PageRank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearlyhometime.com/blog/2008/01/14/first-pagerank-update-of-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like it happened in the last few days (reports suggest 10th to 14th January) and it is a cause to get excited! Well, for me anyway as this blog, NearlyHomeTime.com, now has one! It&#8217;s only PR1, but its a start, and most importantly its feedback against the work I have been doing. I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/first-pagerank-update-of-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google PageRank updates at last &#8211; longest wait ever!</title>
		<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/google-pagerank-updates-at-last-longest-wait-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/google-pagerank-updates-at-last-longest-wait-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines and SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PageRank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearlyhometime.com/blog/2007/10/29/google-pagerank-updates-at-last-longest-wait-ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been a long time since the last Google PageRank update &#8211; 182 days to be precise &#8211; but one started on the 29th October 2007, UK Time. This is the longest time we&#8217;ve ever had to wait for the PageRanks to be publicly viewable. The last one was on the 30th April 2007, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/google-pagerank-updates-at-last-longest-wait-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meta Keywords and Meta Descriptions &#8211; the forgotten friends of SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/meta-keywords-and-meta-descriptions-the-forgotten-friends-of-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/meta-keywords-and-meta-descriptions-the-forgotten-friends-of-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines and SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearlyhometime.com/blog/2007/10/02/meta-keywords-and-meta-descriptions-the-forgotten-friends-of-seo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the mid to late 1990&#8242;s, the job of a web developer was hugely varied. The role would encompass not only the basic development of a site, but also its design, usability, marketing and SEO aspects. SEO at this time consisted, basically, of the following: 1. Adding a Meta Description to the page header [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/meta-keywords-and-meta-descriptions-the-forgotten-friends-of-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Engine Friendly Permanent 301 Redirects with asp.net</title>
		<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/search-engine-friendly-permanent-301-redirects-with-aspnet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/search-engine-friendly-permanent-301-redirects-with-aspnet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines and SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[301]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asp.net]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearlyhometime.com/blog/2007/09/26/search-engine-friendly-permanent-301-redirects-with-aspnet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting a website indexed with a search engine can be a long process. It can take ages for the bot to get around to indexing all your content, and can take even longer to build your sites reputation and page rank. Therefore, when existing pages are replaced or moved, many a good asp.net developer will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/search-engines-seo/search-engine-friendly-permanent-301-redirects-with-aspnet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
