<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is using asp.net bad for SEO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nearlyhometime.com/search-engines-seo/is-using-aspnet-bad-for-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/search-engines-seo/is-using-aspnet-bad-for-seo/</link>
	<description>Yay! It&#039;s nearly home time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:23:28 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie</title>
		<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/search-engines-seo/is-using-aspnet-bad-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearlyhometime.com/?p=42#comment-534</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve found that changing some of the datagrids to repeaters was very straightforward, and really should have been done in the first place. We are getting much more of our deeper pages linked now than we did before, so are seeing a much longer tail on our &#039;long tail&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve found that changing some of the datagrids to repeaters was very straightforward, and really should have been done in the first place. We are getting much more of our deeper pages linked now than we did before, so are seeing a much longer tail on our &#8216;long tail&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
