<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Wars: Slow Take Up of Internet Explorer 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nearlyhometime.com/work/browsers-user-agents/browser-wars-slow-take-up-of-internet-explorer-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/browsers-user-agents/browser-wars-slow-take-up-of-internet-explorer-7/</link>
	<description>Yay! It&#039;s nearly home time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 02:27:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/browsers-user-agents/browser-wars-slow-take-up-of-internet-explorer-7/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearlyhometime.com/blog/2007/10/08/browser-wars-slow-take-up-of-internet-explorer-7/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>The amount of users browsing our site with Safari is stagnant at about 1.5%, and has been all year.

And just when I thought IE7 was on the up again, the last 3 weeks have seen a 1% decline in the usage of IE7. I&#039;m pleased though that another standards compliant browser, Firefox, has increased by 1% over that time. IE6 is solid again though and not moving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amount of users browsing our site with Safari is stagnant at about 1.5%, and has been all year.</p>
<p>And just when I thought IE7 was on the up again, the last 3 weeks have seen a 1% decline in the usage of IE7. I&#8217;m pleased though that another standards compliant browser, Firefox, has increased by 1% over that time. IE6 is solid again though and not moving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjpg</title>
		<link>http://www.nearlyhometime.com/browsers-user-agents/browser-wars-slow-take-up-of-internet-explorer-7/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>mjpg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearlyhometime.com/blog/2007/10/08/browser-wars-slow-take-up-of-internet-explorer-7/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>For a largish public site (250,000 visits a month) I&#039;m involved with, the IE6/IE7 share of all visits has gone from

57% / 28% in Jan 2007 to 
50% / 33% in Sep 2007

so the changeover does seem slow with less than 1% swapping each month. Firefox is currently on about 13%, up from 11.5%. 

Safari sees 3% on the above site. On another site I run, Safari is about 6%. In web development, it&#039;s the Safari use that is significant for me simply because support in web apps is poorer - for example textarea replacment editors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a largish public site (250,000 visits a month) I&#8217;m involved with, the IE6/IE7 share of all visits has gone from</p>
<p>57% / 28% in Jan 2007 to<br />
50% / 33% in Sep 2007</p>
<p>so the changeover does seem slow with less than 1% swapping each month. Firefox is currently on about 13%, up from 11.5%. </p>
<p>Safari sees 3% on the above site. On another site I run, Safari is about 6%. In web development, it&#8217;s the Safari use that is significant for me simply because support in web apps is poorer &#8211; for example textarea replacment editors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

